Barbrey > 26-09-2025, 11:10 PM
(26-09-2025, 10:07 PM)R. Sale Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.As they say, it's complicated. It's a combination of factors. The artist is clearly making an effort to disguise things. At the same time, there is a great loss of cultural contact. We don't know what information the VMs artist(s) may have known about the relevant culture prevalent 1400-1450. When it comes to heraldry, the artist may have been using a means of communication of which the "reader" is not aware. Heraldic elements like the nebuly line and papelonny fur or techniques like heraldic canting [rebus reading].
Then there was Colette of Corbie, totally contemporary with the VMs parchment dates. Plus, the connection of Pope Innocent IV to the original Poor Clares. Can anyone provide a better illustration of Colette's dreams than the VMs artist? <Not me.> Considering that this was a time of contention, and being caught on the 'wrong side' might be bad for the old career.
R. Sale > 27-09-2025, 06:02 AM
Barbrey > 27-09-2025, 07:10 AM
Koen G > 27-09-2025, 08:21 AM
Barbrey > 27-09-2025, 03:44 PM
(27-09-2025, 08:21 AM)Koen G Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.It's not really Christ as the rainbow, I think. The rainbow is either the sign of the covenant (Noah) or of God's throne (Revelation). Even before I joined Voynich research, people were pointing out that double rainbows were mostly found in the context of God's throne.
In the context of "Q13 is stealing common biblical poses and compositions", I have a bunch more that I've never written about, and won't have the time for any time soon. Q13 is one of those places where everyone's entrenched in their own ideas and I find this an unpleasant and unrewarding space to work in. Plenty of other things to research
The double rainbow reminded me of this one though. It should bring to mind a certain folio.
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
R. Sale > 27-09-2025, 04:51 PM
Barbrey > 27-09-2025, 05:07 PM
(27-09-2025, 04:51 PM)R. Sale Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Of course, the double rainbow is frequently used as Christ's throne in the depiction of the Resurrection. The question for VMs interpretation is why the 'throne' is unoccupied.
R. Sale > 27-09-2025, 10:00 PM
Barbrey > 27-09-2025, 10:56 PM
(27-09-2025, 10:00 PM)R. Sale Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Which rainbow are we looking at? The one in Koen's post is clearly double - one for the seat and one for the footrest. And nice cloudbands btw.
The VMs has several rainbows of sorts. Is the text about meteorology and optics dealing with rainbows or is the interpretation more religious. There are other potentially Christian interpretations in this section: the Agnus Dei, Colette of Corbie; but there are also Classical myths from Ovid, Lady Necessity with her cosmic spindle, and the Muses in their half-arcaded fountain, plus pagan references in the form of mythical Melusine of Luxembourg.
Given that the artist has borrowed so widely, it's hard to see some more fanatical orientation pro or con for any specific perspective. It's more a like a collection of references from a wide spectrum of material and the VMs cosmos and the zodiac sequence expand it even further.
Barbrey > 28-09-2025, 10:40 PM
(26-09-2025, 09:43 AM)quimqu Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Note that the supposed man has several lines running down his left arm, giving the impression of a quick movement, as if his arm had just been under water and he lifted it out, with water trickling down. I find this remarkable, because all the other nymphs seem to be posing or making slow movements, whereas this one appears to have just made a swift gesture of pulling his arm from the water.