BessAgritianin > 05-02-2025, 08:24 AM
oshfdk > 05-02-2025, 09:57 AM
bt2901 > 05-02-2025, 03:21 PM
Quote:The alphabet is some transition or a code which is between Glagolitic and Cyrillic.
(The history of the creation of the alphabet is explained in the introduction.)
RobGea > 05-02-2025, 05:30 PM
Quote:Logically, this is another proof, that the original document, whose
translation is Voynich Manuscript had been created by a tropical healer,
who knew the achiote tree and used its fruits scientifically.
Rafal > 05-02-2025, 05:56 PM
BessAgritianin > 06-02-2025, 05:46 AM
(05-02-2025, 09:57 AM)oshfdk Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.I'm not proficient in medieval Moravian (or modern Czech), so I have no idea whether your interpretation is plausible or not.
Why do you interpret "x" as "sh" and "8" as "v"? Are there any Moravian/Czech manuscripts or printed books of the XIV-XVI centuries that demonstrate this way of writing "sh" and "v"? Especially convincing would be if they show it specifically in the words you transcribed, like "poshlibei", "dabav", "imiltjav", "portav", etc.
BessAgritianin > 06-02-2025, 05:50 AM
(05-02-2025, 03:21 PM)bt2901 Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.The file contains the following:I do not understand also many things, but this is the point of the coder. He uses Glagolitic, Latin and Cyrillic characters for his code.
Quote:The alphabet is some transition or a code which is between Glagolitic and Cyrillic.
(The history of the creation of the alphabet is explained in the introduction.)
I was not able to find the mentioned introduction.
Also, I don't see how a benched gallow character (transcribed as "anchiton") could be an intermediate form between Glagolitic Ⱍ and Cyrillic Ч.
Also how x-like character (or mirrored ∝) from Marish and Morish could be related to either Glagolitic Ⱎ or Cyrillic Ш.
BessAgritianin > 06-02-2025, 05:55 AM
(05-02-2025, 05:30 PM)RobGea Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Quoting from your document;No, I am suggesting, that the real author, or creator of the manuscript is not the coder, or the scriber, who wrote it. They are different persons.
Quote:Logically, this is another proof, that the original document, whose
translation is Voynich Manuscript had been created by a tropical healer,
who knew the achiote tree and used its fruits scientifically.
Are you proposing that the person who was the author / creator of the Voynich Manuscript was the same person who wrote the marginalia on You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. ?
BessAgritianin > 06-02-2025, 06:04 AM
(05-02-2025, 05:56 PM)Rafal Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.People will probably tell you that you are taking too much freedom.
First you read the lettters in some very non natural way.
Then you do:
"dabav" is "dobat"
"ola" is "oleja"
"imiltav" is "jmeli stava"
"portav" is "por stava"
and so on.
Of course you may say that it's some forgotten dialect that nobody has seen before. The problem with such approach or related "polyglot" approach
(take altered words from different languages and mix them together) is that you can apply it to any, even nonsensical text, and tune the words from to it until you get some very rough meaning.
oshfdk > 06-02-2025, 06:12 AM
(06-02-2025, 05:46 AM)BessAgritianin Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. Another proof from VM- if you look carefully on the You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. - the alphabet , where "a" begins, then is the second row with VM symbols (almost deleted), then there is a third row, with the real correspondence- against "8" symbol in the third row stays "v".