(03-10-2024, 07:02 PM)LisaFaginDavis Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.I was worried that he had in fact stolen your work, Rich.
Thanks, Lisa, that is very nice of you...
I suppose that, since I do post most of my findings, and thoughts, publicly, it should be expected that some things will show up in books, articles, blogs and so on. And I don't always explain that I found the thing, so it would also be normal for others to just assume "we always knew that". And still further, I can't always know the extent that the person has dug into things, themselves, so it is always possible that they found the same things I did, or others did.
There are a few clues that I was the source, but he couldn't have known they originated with me.
And also, he does have some original material I had not seen (or had forgotten?), but mostly relating to the biographies and activities of the Booles, and the Voynich's, Tiltman, Wellcome, and others. The author goes down different paths than I envisioned, and attempts to tie together Voynich's revolutionary (subversive?) activities with the creation of the manuscript as a forgery. I'm not sure that he did this convincingly, but others might want to read his book and decide for themselves. As for me, I've seen no such connection, and still don't.
I also admit I didn't read every word. I did skip over much of his histories of other famous forgers and forgeries, as I already am familiar with those. Likewise, I am familiar with Sidney Reilly, thanks to Andrew Cooke's book, and also with the Booles and Hintons, thanks to Kennedy (hi, Gerry!)... and so on. So I skimmed those parts, then focused on the core of his forgery hypothesis, to learn what it is comprised of... his why's and how's of a modern forgery. And it turns out we differ very much (whew!) from each other in what we think those why's and how's are. "When" we agree completely... he has it between 1908 and 1912 (of course), and I do, too... but with 1910/11 specifically. But this is his book, and of course he has his own opinions on all that.
The book may be an interesting addition to anyone's "Voynich Library", although not inexpensive. It is possible that it had an especial value to me, for obvious reasons... although I admit that, I think, I have every single publication on the Voynich! I think you boast such a collection, too, no?
Rich.