Koen G > 22-04-2016, 10:53 AM
ReneZ > 22-04-2016, 12:02 PM
(22-04-2016, 09:53 AM)-JKP Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.René, I tried responding to your message here, but it got too long and I needed pictures to explain it so I ended up posting a blog.
For those who are interested:
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
(22-04-2016, 09:56 AM)Searcher Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Rene, on your opinion, could the first letter in the last word of the first line be "k"?
-JKP- > 22-04-2016, 01:46 PM
(22-04-2016, 10:53 AM)Koen Gh. Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.JKP - I read your post and find it very plausible. The messy word does look as if the scribe changed his mind and tried to write out the ligature more fully, then changed his mind again and just started a new word.
Are you sure it's cere and not tere though?
Anton > 22-04-2016, 04:05 PM
Quote:In Latin, olla (jar) = ola (varia lectio)
VViews > 22-04-2016, 04:26 PM
Searcher > 22-04-2016, 06:08 PM
(22-04-2016, 04:05 PM)Anton Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.But given the subsequent "dabas" (= "<you> gave", like someone gave a jar to somebody), if "ola" relates to this, then I think it should have been in accusative declension form ("olum")?!
Even if we consider dative (like someone gave something to a jar), then it would have been "olae"?!
Searcher > 22-04-2016, 09:29 PM
Diane > 24-04-2016, 04:38 PM
-JKP- > 26-04-2016, 11:21 PM
(22-04-2016, 06:13 AM)ReneZ Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.The word "tar" is one of the words I find most difficult to figure out. The "a" looks quite similar to the "a" or "ei" in gasmich or geismich. They do not look like normal a's and I wonder if they should be read as "ei", "ai" or something else.
There are too many strokes just to read "tar".
...
ReneZ > 27-04-2016, 05:43 AM