RE: 116v
-JKP- > 29-09-2018, 03:00 PM
I've been keeping semi-quiet about it (although I constantly mention it in the context of glyph-shape origins), because I can't definitely prove it, but there are signs here and there that whoever created the VMS may have known Greek (either through a classical education or travel or origin). There aren't enough hints to say precisely if it's the result of education or more direct experience.
This is not a new idea, every language has been suggested, including Greek, and everyone tries substitution codes (including Greek), BUT the real challenge is to DEMONSTRATE that there is Greek influence in the text. Saying it's Latin or Greek or whatever, is easy, anyone can list off languages... but getting intelligible text out of Voynichese is much more than just playing a hunch and naming languages, and I'm tired of people who do it (and claim solutions) and then post a bunch of unsupported gobbeldy-gook text, so I didn't want to say too much about it based on small clues and hunches because it isn't enough.
I can get intelligible text out of the VMS. I've had pages of it for quite a few years—a lot more than some of the people claiming solutions, actually, BUT the complication is that I've been able to do it in about five different languages, which MEANS it's probably NOT a solution, it's probably something to do with the basic structure of Voynichese that is generic to languages (which means a synthetic language is also possible), AND... the grammar is hit and miss (sometimes phrases do work grammatically, but not enough of them) and that isn't good enough.
.
Now, all of the above may have nothing to do with the marginalia. The text on 116v is almost readable and is conventional Latin characters, so it may not be related to Voynichese in any way, but something few people mention is the "caret" on the underside of the "o" and it might be important. It might be intended as a pronunciation symbol. If the person writing this learned Latin as a second language (as was the purview of scholars by the 15th century), it might account for the oddities in the text and possibly also for the mark attached to the "o".