Ah well, the whole hoax theory has been discussed a lot on this site too from a number of different angles, including the theory Voynich made it himself, the theory that it was a medieval hoax, and a linguistics experiment that was done to test whether, linguistically, the VM could be a hoax. But searching for the word hoax will bring up a lot of results so I cherry picked a few threads you may want to review (in date order, oldest to latest):
You are not allowed to view links.
Register or
Login to view.
You are not allowed to view links.
Register or
Login to view.
You are not allowed to view links.
Register or
Login to view.
You are not allowed to view links.
Register or
Login to view.
You are not allowed to view links.
Register or
Login to view.
You are not allowed to view links.
Register or
Login to view.
You are not allowed to view links.
Register or
Login to view.
You are not allowed to view links.
Register or
Login to view.
I'm sure there are others I missed.
A number of scholarly papers have been published about the VM being a hoax but the best known ones were published in Cryptologia, one of the Taylor and Francis publications, and I haven't been able to find free copies of them. Some of them have been discussed on this site. The Wikipedia article on the VM notes a few of the hoax theories too.
I don't think anyone has definitively ruled out the possibility yet that the VM is a hoax but there are some very convincing arguments out there that refute the theory. However, as I have said before on this site, no VM theory is wrong until it is proven wrong and there is something to be gained in any line of inquiry, even if it does eventually prove incorrect. I don't know how well researched your theory is yet but you should definitely pursue it until you either prove it right or wrong. You may learn something new that no one else has considered. And yes, that does still happen, even with the VM. I do look forward to reading more on your theory. Hope this helps.