obelus > 30-11-2021, 01:52 PM
(29-11-2021, 03:49 PM)Koen G Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.I'm wondering if you would see anything like this at all in regular manuscripts. Maybe in the first position due to capitalization, and maybe in the final position due to increased incentive for using abbreviation-related glyphs. For anything outside of that, I can't think of any good examples.
MichelleL11 > 30-11-2021, 03:12 PM
pfeaster > 30-11-2021, 06:26 PM
(29-11-2021, 04:19 PM)MarcoP Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Given that aiin is so frequent in B, it seems possible that (in B) daiin is a line-initial variant of aiin, one of Emma's You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.. As I discussed with Emma (and possibly on the forum) years ago, it does not seem that daiin in A can be equivalent to aiin in B, since daiin often appears reduplicated as daiin.daiin while aiin never does.
R. Sale > 30-11-2021, 06:29 PM
pfeaster > 30-11-2021, 08:05 PM
(30-11-2021, 01:38 AM)LisaFaginDavis Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.I'd love to hear what you see as the implications of these positional observations. Do different sections reveal different patterns? Are these patterns the result of different topics? Or a sophisticated encipherment? What about the different scribes who write in Currier B (i.e. my scribe 2 vs. 3 vs. 4 vs. 5)? Do they reveal different underlying patterns?
Koen G > 30-11-2021, 08:40 PM
LisaFaginDavis > 30-11-2021, 09:35 PM
pfeaster > 30-11-2021, 11:58 PM
(30-11-2021, 08:40 PM)Koen G Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.If you divide a scribe's pages in two parts, are those parts more similar to each other than to different scribes? This would be a good control.
Koen G > 01-12-2021, 12:08 AM
lurker > 01-12-2021, 12:50 AM