@LisaFaginDavis, I like your writing style a lot, no pun intended.
Looking at Table 1, I noticed that noteworthy folios 57 and 66 are one bifolio, written by two different scribes. If Scribe 1 wrote the famously rare-character-dense roundel of You are not allowed to view links.
Register or
Login to view. first, then Scribe 5 would have composed the indices / "key-like sequence" of You are not allowed to view links.
Register or
Login to view. with You are not allowed to view links.
Register or
Login to view. right in front of him. Or vice-versa, if Scribe 5 wrote first. This makes me want to revisit possible correspondences between the sequences of glyphs (and vords) on both pages. For example, it's probably coincidental, but You are not allowed to view links.
Register or
Login to view. has 34 characters in its key-like sequence, while the second-outermost ring of You are not allowed to view links.
Register or
Login to view. has a sequence of 17 characters, repeated 4 times. (17 x 2 = 34). I find it interesting too, that there appears to be a paragraph break after the first 17 characters and their corresponding lines of text on f66r. It's only from that point down that each character does not line up neatly with a specific line, leaving a total of 32 lines of text, despite 34 index glyphs. Again, I'm probably seeing what I want to see, or at the very most, seeing what the authors of the VMs want to mislead me into seeing. But I thought I'd point it out; 17 is not a number I frequently encounter.