ReneZ > 02-04-2020, 05:12 PM
Mark Knowles > 02-04-2020, 06:28 PM
(02-04-2020, 05:12 PM)ReneZ Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.It all depends how wide one's definition of cipher is.
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
MarcoP > 03-04-2020, 08:50 AM
Quote:You seem to believe that Voynichese cannot be related to diplomatic ciphers of the period as you seem to be saying that the Voynichese cannot have features connected to or related to that of homophones. Is this a correct assessment of your position?
Aga Tentakulus > 03-04-2020, 09:40 AM
Mark Knowles > 03-04-2020, 10:39 AM
Mark Knowles > 03-04-2020, 12:23 PM
Mark Knowles > 03-04-2020, 12:33 PM
-JKP- > 03-04-2020, 12:43 PM
(03-04-2020, 12:23 PM)Mark Knowles Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.(03-04-2020, 08:50 AM)MarcoP Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
You might want to add to your list the extent of visual commonality of character sets.
There is significantly more in common in character sets with the Voynich than the other historical examples that you listed. This is not just the "4o", but there are a number of other glyphs.
Mark Knowles > 03-04-2020, 12:44 PM
(03-04-2020, 12:43 PM)-JKP- Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.(03-04-2020, 12:23 PM)Mark Knowles Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.(03-04-2020, 08:50 AM)MarcoP Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
You might want to add to your list the extent of visual commonality of character sets.
There is significantly more in common in character sets with the Voynich than the other historical examples that you listed. This is not just the "4o", but there are a number of other glyphs.
They are called medieval Latin characters/ligatures/abbreviations.
Mark Knowles > 03-04-2020, 12:57 PM