ReneZ > 29-04-2021, 05:40 AM
Helmut Winkler > 29-04-2021, 08:36 AM
(29-04-2021, 05:40 AM)ReneZ Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.An aspect that must be taken into account is, that it is not on paper but on parchment.
This requires an explanation.
For most of post-VMS history, and for most motivations, paper would have been the obvious choice.
ReneZ > 29-04-2021, 09:14 AM
(29-04-2021, 08:36 AM)Helmut Winkler Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Not if it is Italian, paper would have been more likely in Germany, parchment in I.. As a matter of fact it is one of the reasons why I (and I suppose some others) think it is Italian.
Helmut Winkler > 29-04-2021, 09:55 AM
(29-04-2021, 09:14 AM)ReneZ Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.[quote='Helmut Winkler' pid='45029' dateline='1619681780']
Not if it is Italian, paper would have been more likely in Germany, parchment in I.. As a matter of fact it is one of the reasons why I (and I suppose some others) think it is Italian.
-JKP- > 29-04-2021, 08:17 PM
(29-04-2021, 09:14 AM)ReneZ Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view....
Just to be sure, this is about the single sheet found by Fabrizio Salani.
The proposed explanation that this would be a copy made by Barschius in Prague in the 1630's is very problematic, considering the fact that it is on parchment.
This issue also applies to many other potential explanations of this page.
A "modern" practical joke is not excluded by this.
(Please note that I specifically do not wish to suggest that Fabrizio would be involved in anything like this. I am sure that he is completely honest about this find).
Anton > 29-04-2021, 08:29 PM
Koen G > 29-04-2021, 08:30 PM
-JKP- > 29-04-2021, 08:41 PM
Anton > 29-04-2021, 08:41 PM
-JKP- > 29-04-2021, 08:49 PM