ReneZ > 14-12-2019, 09:35 AM
MarcoP > 15-12-2019, 11:47 AM
ReneZ > 15-12-2019, 01:23 PM
MarcoP > 15-12-2019, 05:08 PM
(15-12-2019, 01:23 PM)ReneZ Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Hi Marco,
I am wondering. Is the choice of the substitution to be tested something that is a user input, or is this decided (in your setup) by an algorithm?
In a one-pass approach, as you did before, this can be user input, but if it has to be iterative or progressive, this will not really be possible anymore. It significantly changes the entire approach...
MarcoP > 19-12-2019, 03:21 PM
ReneZ > 20-12-2019, 12:49 AM
MarcoP > 21-03-2020, 02:50 PM
Emma May Smith > 21-03-2020, 05:29 PM
MarcoP > 21-03-2020, 06:43 PM
(21-03-2020, 05:29 PM)Emma May Smith Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.When you say that certain sections are closer than others in "dialect", is this due to the strength of certain features or their presence/absence?
(21-03-2020, 05:29 PM)Emma May Smith Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Can we map individual features across the five dialects in a spectrum-like way?
MarcoP > 24-03-2020, 10:59 AM
Julian Wrote:In all the tests I ran, there were some common features in the results:
Mixing between “e” and “y” [i.e. l and r]– when writing Language A, the use of “e” appears to be equivalent to the use of “y” in Language B, and vice versa
Mixing between 8,f,F,k,K,g,G,r,R,? and so on – the Gallows glyphs swap amongst themselves, and “8” [EVA:d]