Torsten > 18-11-2019, 08:11 PM
(17-11-2019, 09:58 PM)farmerjohn Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.And if one thinks that EVA-sh and EVA-ch are the same based on correlation values, he must be very cunning when explaining almost equally high correlation coefficient for EVA-ok and EVA-qokIndeed there is not only a relation between 'ch' and 'sh'. There are far more relations. One of them is indeed between 'ok' and 'qok'.
DONJCH > 18-11-2019, 11:36 PM
RenegadeHealer > 19-11-2019, 01:19 AM
Davidsch > 21-11-2019, 01:05 PM
farmerjohn > 21-11-2019, 04:10 PM
(13-11-2019, 09:37 PM)Torsten Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Additionally I have calculated the token frequencies for all 612 ch/sh word pairs for all folios. The resulting correlation coefficient is +0.55. To make comparison easier I have also calculated the correlation coefficient for the word frequencies for all 612 ch/sh word pairs for the whole MS. This correlation coefficient is +0.93.
Pearson's Correlation(count(chWords@folios),count(shWords@folios)): +0.55 (n=225 folios*612 word pairs=137700,p=too close to zero to calculate)
Pearson's Correlation(count(chWords@VMS), count(shWords@VMS)): +0.93 (n=612 word pairs,p=4.54E-268)
RenegadeHealer > 21-11-2019, 08:27 PM
(21-11-2019, 01:05 PM)Davidsch Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.I do not agree RenegadeHealer with your big picture, such is much too soon to conclude. I want to focus on this smaller group first.
After returning back here after a whil, I must admit, there is a lot of data in this thread, and I am now a bit lost in the discussion.
Torsten > 22-11-2019, 12:16 AM
(17-11-2019, 02:21 PM)MarcoP Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.These are the plots for the next four more frequent ch- words vs their sh- counterparts.
(17-11-2019, 02:21 PM)MarcoP Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Per-section correlation also tends to be low, but there are a couple of possibly interesting exceptions, e.g. chey/shey in Stars.
nickpelling > 22-11-2019, 02:27 AM
MarcoP > 22-11-2019, 09:36 AM
(22-11-2019, 02:27 AM)nickpelling Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.My conclusion is that even though ch and sh have broadly similar ratios in A and B......the ways that ch and sh touch following tokens seem to have widely different distributions in A and B, and I think this is almost entirely incompatible with the suggestion that ch and sh are essentially expressing the same thing.
- ch A = ch B x 2.82
- sh A = sh B x 2.18
nickpelling > 22-11-2019, 04:34 PM