Posts: 10,536Threads: 432
Member details
Posts: 10,536
Threads: 432
Thanks Received: 4,933 in 2,808 posts
Thanks Given: 4868
Joined: Mar 2016
Reputation:
11
Country:
Interesting, will read soon. Somehow I feel like I've been on this blog before, though I can't remember how or why. Apparently he only started writing about the VM recently.
Anyway, good to have some new Voynich blogging to read, since much of the blogosphere still lies dormant.
Posts: 10,536Threads: 432
Member details
Posts: 10,536
Threads: 432
Thanks Received: 4,933 in 2,808 posts
Thanks Given: 4868
Joined: Mar 2016
Reputation:
11
Country:
It's really like 10 words about the manuscript for each 100 words of text. Anyway, as I read through it, here's some quotes that stand out:
Quote:Before I go on any further, what I have already uncovered within the Manuscript itself, is a very controversial subject, and this Manuscript reveals a very controversial text, that can be perceived as blasphemy to some [...] Given the age, the controversy, the Documentaries made on the subject, and a lot of further associations, I now feel a sense of obligation, which I really did not want, nor asked for.
That's quite the collection of red flags there, but okay, benefit of the doubt.
Quote:For those not knowing what a millennia stands for, one millennia equals 1000 years.
Quote:To save you the reader from continuing any further down a topic of discussion that you may not handle, I’m given you full warning now; this Manuscript is completely Biblical in nature.
Okay so it's getting worse as I read on. He thinks the manuscript is not original because the numbers have been added later, gets a bit conspiracy-theory-like about some scans which are only available in black and white (??)
He does present some well made images suggesting that the map is supposed to be seen in three vertical tiers:
But that's about all I got from it...
Posts: 948Threads: 31
Member details
Posts: 948
Threads: 31
Thanks Received: 349 in 210 posts
Thanks Given: 385
Joined: Apr 2016
Reputation:
5
Country:
Although the cycle of those blog posts is not without some logical conclusions, in general, it is talking about nothing. I don't like such a manner: too much of vapidity and preliminary defence from critical comments.