Sneering that those who don't accept your theory have intellectual constipation, that linguists who don't accept it have mental problems, and that people here don't want to see the evidence is going to get you nowhere. It's sad because you started off with a lot of goodwill in this thread, which I've never seen any other theory get. Turkish was high up as a candidate language on some people's shortlists, and you came with at least initial support from Lisa Fagin Davies. But since then, everything has been a disappointment.
(04-10-2021, 03:06 AM)Ahmet Ardıç Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.In this way, we showed 700 words, 100 sentences and 82 word-drawing matches.
Can you please share these 100 sentences here (see point below) in English? The only one I found in this thread was one saying a stalk had a fat and/or cute root. The Translated Sentence section on your site has only 18 examples, and not all of them seem to be sentences, and all are in Turkish. We cannot evaluate your claim without at the least full sentences and lots of them, preferably in context.
(04-10-2021, 03:06 AM)Ahmet Ardıç Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view....It's been almost 4 years since we put forward our findings. There is not a single fundamental and reasoned objection that could refute or nullify our work...
...If you will not accept our clame, please you will have to explain us the reasons in scientifically way.
Others have said this earlier on in the thread, but it seems to be worthy of repeating: it is not for us to disprove or refute your theory. It is for you to prove it. You have not done so. You have not offered proof that the isolated findings are more than coincidence that is helped by your generous degrees of freedom (as summarised by Pepper You are not allowed to view links.
Register or
Login to view.), and you haven't addressed the reasonable queries others had earlier in this thread about how your theory accounts for quirks of Voynichese.
(04-10-2021, 03:06 AM)Ahmet Ardıç Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.So we showed the word SAZAK and say that is one of the clear match. Now people looking at this have 3 ways only. The first is to accept this reading, and the second is to say that it is a coincidence in the space of possibilities. The third way is to remain silent. Which way would you choose?
The fourth. I won't accept your reading. Nor will I say it is definitely a coincidence, although the experience of other theories and your generous degrees of freedom lean heavily in that direction. And I'm obviously not remaining silent.
So the fourth way: to point out to you that you have myriad competitors, many of whom have also "identified" an isolated word that matches one in their target language. Some have identified many words. A tiny minority went as far as translating sentences, albeit nonsense ones. And like you, all of them have exclaimed
"It can't possibly be a coincidence!"
Every. Single. One. We can all agree that Voynichese can't all at once be Turkic, Slovenian, Middle English, Polish, Proto-Romance, Hebrew, Persian, Welsh-Urdu, etc, etc.
So, there are an awful lot of
"It can't be a coincidence!" findings turning out to be... coincidences.
This history, and your degrees of freedom, mean the probability is that your findings are in that unfortunate camp. If you want to differentiate yourself from the others and reduce that probability, you need to be providing people in this thread with meaningful sentences, preferably paragraphs, to demonstrate clear grammar consistent with your suggested language. And to explain how your theory accounts for all of the non-language-like traits of Voynichese.
If you don't do that, no amount of presenting isolated words and shouting "Maths! Science! Constipation!" at us will get you anywhere.