Searcher > 08-02-2018, 11:50 PM
Koen G > 09-02-2018, 12:54 AM
Searcher > 09-02-2018, 12:59 AM
Diane > 09-02-2018, 01:26 AM
Searcher > 09-02-2018, 11:30 AM
(09-02-2018, 01:26 AM)Diane Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Searcher - May I make a suggestion?
If you can, would you add the dates and sources for the pictures so we can get a clearer idea of possible cause-and-effect. It would also be the civil thing to do to run a google search and acknowledge the first person(s) to suggest similarities that you repeat in your paper. If only everyone did that it would save a lot of embarrassment and no-one could possibly suggest you'd just 'lifted it'.
If that alchemical image of the mirrored lion is dated much later than 1438, it must affect any inferences drawn so again date and source is important for readers to know.
On the same detail - what marks the Vms picture of the twinned bodies as not of Latin descent is that - quite unlike anything I've ever seen in the Latins' medieval art anyway - each body is drawn to suggest a very different sort of animal from the other. I identified the style, and suggested that one of the bodies was meant for a lion, and the other probably for a blackbuck doe.
Two identical, but 'mirrored' bodies sharing a single head is not uncommon in Latin heraldic art, and I've been especially intrigued by the profusion of such forms in medieval carving including misericords. But from a Latins' point of view the head of one sort of animal shared between two distinctly different bodies seems to have been treated with revulsion because the instances are so very few. (I say 'very few' - in fact I've yet to see any).
Searcher > 10-02-2018, 06:05 PM
-JKP- > 10-02-2018, 09:00 PM