Searcher > 12-05-2020, 08:05 PM
Anton > 12-05-2020, 08:42 PM
Searcher > 12-05-2020, 09:33 PM
(12-05-2020, 08:42 PM)Anton Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.The VMS has a look of a book of practice, not a treatise of abstract science for the sake of science, so I would expect it to be imbued with astrological notions and concepts. All this is definitely waiting some historian of astrology to look into.I agree with you, Anton, in general, tides are not that subject that kept interest of many astrologers /astronomers in that time. It was rather an exception than a rule.
ReneZ > 13-05-2020, 05:56 AM
-JKP- > 13-05-2020, 08:00 AM
Searcher > 13-05-2020, 10:14 AM
Anton > 13-05-2020, 12:56 PM
(13-05-2020, 10:14 AM)Searcher Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.On my view, the VMs contains pages with astrological context, but not f67v2.
(13-05-2020, 10:14 AM)Searcher Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Anton, I couldn't understand what you mean under the "rulers of the water", because it is not correct. All the planets are the rulers of a certain Sign of the Zodiac and the rulers of Triplicities (in elemental divizion of the Zodiac). It doesn't mean that Venus or Mars rule over the water or over the tides, they are rulers of the water Signs (Scorpio, Cancer, Pisces). Obviously, f67v2 must contain, at least, one of those signs to make any sense. As for me, I don't see any evidence that f67v2 contains something that relates to the water zodiacal signs and their ruler.
Anton > 13-05-2020, 01:32 PM
Searcher > 13-05-2020, 02:31 PM