DG97EEB > 24-12-2025, 09:31 PM
(14-07-2017, 10:03 AM)MarcoP Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Full scans of Firenze ms 106 can be seen online. The ms includes one of the earliest copies of the Alchemical Herbal.
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
ReneZ > 25-12-2025, 12:26 AM
DG97EEB > 25-12-2025, 07:55 AM
(25-12-2025, 12:26 AM)ReneZ Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.It has so many coincidental similarities with the Voynich MS that it is easy to imagine (hypothesis alert) that both manuscripts would have been in the interest of similar groups of people, and may have travelled similar paths:
They have the same size.
They were created around the same time.
A later owner wrote a cipher alphabet on the first page (ciphers don't usually go with herbals).
Florence 106 was created in N. Italy but spent some time in N. France before coming back. (This is entirely possible, but not known with any certainty for the Voynich MS).
MarcoP > 25-12-2025, 09:02 AM
Rampling Wrote:In the absence of decipherable text, the most promising guide to understanding the written content of the Voynich manuscript is its extensive set of illustrations. Yet these enigmatic images often serve to complicate the mystery further. … Of all the manuscript’s iconographical puzzles, none is more perplexing than the so-called biological or balneological section, with its many illustrations of unclothed female figures sporting within a complex system of waterworks, whether bathing in pools of green liquid or emerging from mysterious arrangements of pipes.
Antonio García Jiménez > 25-12-2025, 11:46 AM
DG97EEB > 25-12-2025, 01:27 PM
(25-12-2025, 09:02 AM)MarcoP Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Personally I agree with Jennifer M. Rampling, historian of medieval science, medicine, and alchemy (Yale facsimile):
Rampling Wrote:In the absence of decipherable text, the most promising guide to understanding the written content of the Voynich manuscript is its extensive set of illustrations. Yet these enigmatic images often serve to complicate the mystery further. … Of all the manuscript’s iconographical puzzles, none is more perplexing than the so-called biological or balneological section, with its many illustrations of unclothed female figures sporting within a complex system of waterworks, whether bathing in pools of green liquid or emerging from mysterious arrangements of pipes.
The sequence of the zodiac medallions is the better understood part of the illustrations, and good parallels have been found. But the arrangement of the zodiac pages as a whole (with the radially arranged “nymphs”) is only vaguely paralleled by Alfonso X’s Astromagia and Lapidario, from a different time and (probably) region than the Voynich manuscript.
The “De Balneis” was an influential medical work by the Salerno school and is a decent parallel for some of the Quire13 pools (but not the pipes, as the attached image). Other parallels like Astromagia or Fontana are unique works and not “commonplace” at all. The Alchemical Herbal was widespread in Italy, but it is also mysterious and only partially understood, in particular, its origin is unclear. And there is the fact that all these parallels are only partially similar, with no clear signs of being a direct influence. So I think that Rampling’s view of Voynich images as enigmatic rather than commonplace is fully justified.
oshfdk > 25-12-2025, 01:59 PM
(25-12-2025, 01:27 PM)DG97EEB Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Structurally, it behaves more like an instrument or reference aid: diagrams dominate, text never explains anything, and the same tightly constrained writing system is reused across very different kinds of pages. That’s a strange design if the goal were teaching or description, but it’s exactly what you’d expect if the manuscript was meant to be used by someone who already knew the system.
DG97EEB > 25-12-2025, 02:09 PM
(25-12-2025, 02:02 PM)nablator Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.(25-12-2025, 01:27 PM)DG97EEB Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.That wouldn’t make it a cipher — just something that was never meant to be read independently.
AI-generated post, em dash and all...
happy Christmas though...(25-12-2025, 01:59 PM)oshfdk Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.(25-12-2025, 01:27 PM)DG97EEB Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Structurally, it behaves more like an instrument or reference aid: diagrams dominate, text never explains anything, and the same tightly constrained writing system is reused across very different kinds of pages. That’s a strange design if the goal were teaching or description, but it’s exactly what you’d expect if the manuscript was meant to be used by someone who already knew the system.
This is not how I see it, I think proper diagrams are relatively rare, if you don't count the plant images. And there are plenty of text-only pages with no drawings at all. I'm not sure I understand "text never explains anything" part, how can we know this without reading the text?