bi3mw > 24-12-2020, 04:47 PM
Searcher > 24-12-2020, 06:20 PM
(24-12-2020, 04:47 PM)bi3mw Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Prompted by a discussion in another thread, I have the following question: the Arab alchemists in the ninth and tenth centuries proposed that all metals are composed of two basic "principles": Sulfur and Mercury. The union of alchemical sulfur and mercury in the perfect proportions should result in the Philosopher's Stone. But what about the salt ? As far as I know, Paracelsus added salt to create a trinity of alchemical elements. Unfortunately, I do not know any more sources that support this assumption. Does anyone know more about this ?
bi3mw > 24-12-2020, 08:16 PM
Quote:The red mercury sulfide, vermilion, finally had several properties that made it a good candidate for the philosopher's stone: it is red, heavy (like gold) and - like gold - does not dissolve in any acid except aqua regia. The fact that it could not be used to cause transmutation could have been interpreted as follows: the starting materials were not pure enough. And for this there was a way out: one subjects the vermilion to the dry heating and it distills off mercury again - the mercurius can be recovered "purified" and used again for the "great work".
Quote:So did vermilion-makers think they might actually be making the Philosopher’s stone? When I give talks about colour-making chemistry, I have always taken care to disabuse audiences of that idea. Jabir’s Sulfur and Mercury are subtle, intangible ‘principles’, I say, and not the same thing as the earthly elements extracted from the ground. ‘Alchemists said that sulfur is not Sulfur and mercury is not Mercury,’ warns Bucklow – so vermilion ‘is a poor “material copy” of a “spiritual pattern.”
DONJCH > 25-12-2020, 01:02 AM
RenegadeHealer > 25-12-2020, 02:16 AM
(25-12-2020, 01:02 AM)DONJCH Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Interesting that the ideas of Jung got in there. I sometimes wonder if a Jungian type concept could be involved in the VMS.
bi3mw > 25-12-2020, 01:12 PM
Quote:C. G. Jung proves that the observable phenomena of the unconscious, namely dreams and visions, produce pictorial connections, as they are also encountered in the symbolism of alchemy. From this arises the possibility of an understanding of the enigmatic 'Hermetic' ideas, which are characterized as much by parallelism as by opposition to the basic Christian ideas. The parallel which alchemy draws between its so-called 'philosopher's stone' and Christ is worthy of detailed study. In "Memories, Dreams, Thoughts" Jung gives information about his work on the book, which kept him busy for more than a decade: 'Very soon I had seen that Analytical Psychology strangely coincides with Alchemy. The experiences of the alchemists were my experiences, and their world was in a sense my world. This was, of course, an ideal discovery for me, for with it I had found the historical counterpart to my psychology of the unconscious. It now received a historical ground. The possibility of comparison with alchemy as well as the spiritual continuity back to Gnosticism gave it substance. Through the occupation with the ancient texts everything found its place: the imagery of the imaginations, the experiential material I had collected in my practice, and the conclusions I had drawn from it. Now I began to realize what the contents meant in a historical perspective. My understanding of their typical character, which had already been initiated by my myth research, deepened. The archetypes and the essence of the archetype moved into the center of my research, and I realized that without history there is no psychology and all the more no psychology of the unconscious.'
DONJCH > 25-12-2020, 02:09 PM
R. Sale > 26-12-2020, 07:32 PM
bi3mw > 26-12-2020, 10:10 PM
(26-12-2020, 07:32 PM)R. Sale Wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.And the best example of alchemical symbolism in the VMs is ... ???So far, I can't find an example, but I still think it's appropriate here to address C. G. Jung and his perspective. After all, one must first introduce a possibility to check whether it can lead to the right path or not. The result is not a foregone conclusion