03-12-2016, 09:07 PM
My opinion still haven't changed from that time I firstly published it, maybe, it will be interesting to people, who are not familiar with my interpretation. Besides, this time I want to show the exact picture that I see there. I must confess that some lines was detected after analysis and comparison of some strange objects of the VMs. Actually, it could almost impossible without such an approach, because we can detect a faded or illegible notes more or less successfully, only if we know well those symbols or letters.
![[Image: attachment.php?aid=963]](http://www.voynich.ninja/attachment.php?aid=963)
Point 1 - original edited image (JKP's variant)
Point 2 - shows darkened lines as I see this
Point 3 - the first variant of interpretation of a possibly faded detail
Point 4 - the second variant of interpretation of a possibly faded detail
And now look at the comparison below.
![[Image: attachment.php?aid=964]](http://www.voynich.ninja/attachment.php?aid=964)
Personally my conclusions from this is that the "bird-glyph" means "R", i. e., I think, it acts as the sigil of the word in the top left corner of the Rosettes.
I consider the handwriting here differs from the main on the basis of my vision of this inscription and due to the shape of the letter "a".
Point 1 - original edited image (JKP's variant)
Point 2 - shows darkened lines as I see this
Point 3 - the first variant of interpretation of a possibly faded detail
Point 4 - the second variant of interpretation of a possibly faded detail
And now look at the comparison below.
Personally my conclusions from this is that the "bird-glyph" means "R", i. e., I think, it acts as the sigil of the word in the top left corner of the Rosettes.
I consider the handwriting here differs from the main on the basis of my vision of this inscription and due to the shape of the letter "a".


![[+]](https://www.voynich.ninja/images/collapse_collapsed.png)