(Yesterday, 01:43 PM)npcompl33t wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.It’s also possible to ignore multiple lines of evidence because you don’t like the conclusions.
This could be a problem with the way data are presented. I tried to understand the process and the results at You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. and I still have no idea what exactly I'm looking at. For example, you mention angles, what are the angles measured relative to? What is used as the normal orientation? If it's the orientation of the scans, we don't know how exactly the scans were aligned, my guess is relative to the gutter fold, but this means the angles depend on the way the physical bifolios lie when the book is open, which I think in turn depends on the folds and the stitching of bifolios. So, the chains you uncovered could to some extent simply represent a progressive skewing of folios as you go from one side of a quire to the other.