24-10-2026, 02:08 PM
(This post was last modified: 24-10-2026, 02:23 PM by npcompl33t.)
Are you trolling now? I genuinely can’t tell. You known that the graph is just showing the 1st two dimensions of a path that moved through more than 2 dimensions right? The connections (if you read the paper) are between the closest points. The distances are distorted not from stretching but because they don’t capture all of the dimensions.
It seems to me like he does indeed recover tomb chronology even if some ordering is ambiguous, or not exact, which was my claim.
He still identifies a dominant overall time dimension, that holds up under radiocarbon dating.
It seems to me like he does indeed recover tomb chronology even if some ordering is ambiguous, or not exact, which was my claim.
He still identifies a dominant overall time dimension, that holds up under radiocarbon dating.
![[+]](https://www.voynich.ninja/images/collapse_collapsed.png)