New reading hypothesis on f85v (Rosettes): “Paris Kar

[ololololo]

But my instinct, showing my own biases, is that it might well be a hint into iin as a productive suffix

I meant that the author’s intention was to lead us astray. Therefore, he could have used the symbols a, in/iin, y, and r, assuming that we would confuse them with Latin.

But your assumption is interesting too