11-09-2026, 10:34 AM
Yes, very odd. I tried multiple LLMs which were convinced the last word is 'ist' - which is clearly false. But LLMs tell you what they expect to see, we all know that.
I also think 'lijjt' is the best candidate so far, but whether it means 'liegt' or 'litt', (is lying or is suffering) the sentence doesn't fully make sense.
'Der um den leib gefangen liegt' may men 'who is imprisoned in the body' (paralyzed). But it's a weird formulation. I'd expect 'im' oder 'in seinem', not 'um den'
The 'ij' combo sounds Dutch to me but I am not familiar with NW-German dialects.
If the last word is 'bit' -> 'bittet', the 'umb' makes more sense (um etwas bittet -> asks or begs for something), but then the 'lyp' makes no sense. Begs for the imprisoned body?
I also think 'lijjt' is the best candidate so far, but whether it means 'liegt' or 'litt', (is lying or is suffering) the sentence doesn't fully make sense.
'Der um den leib gefangen liegt' may men 'who is imprisoned in the body' (paralyzed). But it's a weird formulation. I'd expect 'im' oder 'in seinem', not 'um den'
The 'ij' combo sounds Dutch to me but I am not familiar with NW-German dialects.
If the last word is 'bit' -> 'bittet', the 'umb' makes more sense (um etwas bittet -> asks or begs for something), but then the 'lyp' makes no sense. Begs for the imprisoned body?