Rethinking the Glyph Inventory/Tokenization: Are the Gallows Compositional?

[ololololo]

I am doing something similar, just yesterday i started making my own transcription of quire 13. One line done so far, oh boy! But as I go I am describing the many ways I see each glyph, including whether they could be seen as constructions, such as the thing that looks like an a but that looks like a e attached to an i and whether they touch another or stand alone, etc. I want such notes in my transcription to cover all possibilities rather than rely on eva, even in my one line so far there is at least one place I would change the eva transcription from an r to an s or vice versa, can't remember offhand.

I forget which one I was comparing to, but I plan to go back and compare all the ones I can find, in case there are other considerations to add.
@ololololo what does CVS stand for? I tried to look it up in the forum and on the internet but the highest hits are multiple curriculum vitae and some kind of pharmacy.

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.

For me, CLS is associated with a certain rule, according to which in most words, characters of type Curve come first, followed by characters of type Line, or the word consists only of Curve elements. Example: daiin (rule 1), chedy (rule 2).

And I was wrong — it’s CLS, not CVS