04-08-2026, 12:44 PM
(This post was last modified: 04-08-2026, 12:54 PM by Jorge_Stolfi.)
(04-08-2026, 11:51 AM)Koen G wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.(04-08-2026, 10:47 AM)Jorge_Stolfi wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.pareidolia [...] a smattering of random smudges that were once Voynichese glyphs.
Allow me some vigorous quote-trimming to highlight the irony of this statement.
Indeed it is ironic that those who have disimissed the whole retracing thread as "pareidolia" are still so keen on trying to "see" meaningful words in the You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. text.
Face it, folks. If the text on You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. was a meaningful message in any Germanic dialect and/or Romance language, even by a poorly educated scribe, the real paleographers would have identified the language and translated its meaning, a century ago. Their failure to do so should be enough proof that it is not any real language, and there is no message.
There is no way that "six marix morix vix abia ma'ria" can be a meaningful Latin or Romance sentence. Maybe whoever wrote "poxleber" indeed meant "buck's liver", and where he wrote "so nim" and "mich" he indeed meant those German words. But those would be just his (totally bogus) guesses for whatever smudges remained of the original text.
All the best, --stolfi

