01-08-2026, 10:51 AM
(01-08-2026, 09:29 AM)Koen G wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.One thing we must keep in mind is that "Pisces first" is part of the original design. However, the month mismatch is done by a later 15thC hand and may have nothing to do with the source MS.
However, if the pisces foldout had been the same size as f72 (only 1 page longer), there would have simply been room for an aquarius, making it a completely normal sequence. And/or room for capricorn on the recto, giving room for an unusual capricorn beginning sequence, too.
But speculating whether the pisces foldout could have ever been 1 page longer is a totally different topic, and I have no evidence that that was or could have been the case, so i'll just keep searching for both pisces first and capricorn first sequences. I've been checking for both for every entry, but I've found nothing certain so far for "pisces first" unfortunately.