27-07-2026, 06:18 AM
@ age But the “u” in “umen” looks exactly like the ‘p’ in “palsen”; it's just missing the down stroke there, too.
That the following “a” is also missing its entire front part is just a guess—I have to admit that—and it's not very clever.
If you want to read the glyph before the “n” as an “e,” then it would spell “pmen”—which doesn’t make any sense.
But then, without making any further assumptions, you could also read the first stroke of the “m” as an “i.” Then it would read “pinen.”
Pinen = strafen = to punish
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
Maybe that’s a possibility, and I think someone had already suggested that.
That the following “a” is also missing its entire front part is just a guess—I have to admit that—and it's not very clever.
If you want to read the glyph before the “n” as an “e,” then it would spell “pmen”—which doesn’t make any sense.
But then, without making any further assumptions, you could also read the first stroke of the “m” as an “i.” Then it would read “pinen.”
Pinen = strafen = to punish
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
Maybe that’s a possibility, and I think someone had already suggested that.