(22-07-2026, 12:29 PM)J_Voy wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.So why does the last line almost seem to refer back to the first? "poxleber" (buck's liver), "gaſmich" (goat's milk), suggesting to the reader so first take the liver of a goat, then the milk of a goat?poxleber is more of a swear word. In any case, the author of this text wanted this spell to be meaningful. He may have triedYou are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. or restore the text, but he ended up making a mistake.
(22-07-2026, 12:29 PM)J_Voy wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.A shape just just like a 4, or indeed, q is just a consequence of writing a '+' symbol in one stroke.By the way, this is interesting...
(22-07-2026, 12:41 PM)J_Voy wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.I can see how this could be mistaken for 'M', but the reason I believe it's 'N' is that capital 'N' was common in medieval charms, a short form of the Latin word 'Nomen', meaning name, which is why is stood for the specific person's name.It is very similar to the minuscule m. Although you're probably right that it's some kind of abbreviation or special notation, because the author writes m and n differently.


