18-07-2026, 02:40 PM
(18-07-2026, 02:23 PM)Rafal wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Yes, I was referring to the type of artificial languages you mentioned. The fact is that they were not intended for communication in general, but rather for writing specific texts.Quote:Voynichese may be an artificial language (as Friedman said), but it is not a "conlang" in the usual sense. At the very least, it was impossible to communicate on it.
I am curious about your definition of "constructed language" (conlang) and how it differs from "artificial language".
By the way, most conlangs were never spoken by a group of people and never reached the form allowing free, easy discussion.
Things like Esperanto are exception. You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. was most probably never spoken, You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.was most probably never spoken, You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.was most probably never spoken and so on.
But I don't know which name would be better - an artificial language or a philosophical language?


