18-07-2026, 01:14 PM
(17-07-2026, 11:16 PM)Daniel1992 wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.What I'm getting at is closer to Friedman's take after his ~40 years on this, an invented notation system, not a natural language with abbreviations bolted on, and not a straightforward cipher either.Would a medieval doctor need such a system? Why would he invent a rather complicated system of abbreviations from scratch (if you don't think so, try it yourself), when he can encrypt or write in a lesser-known language that he knows? There are also no historical candidates for such a system of abbreviations.
Voynichese may be an artificial language (as Friedman said), but it is not a "conlang" in the usual sense. At the very least, it was impossible to communicate on it.
(17-07-2026, 11:16 PM)Daniel1992 wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.On Constance and Hus, I connected it to the Constance event since it was a major event for physicians in the region, and I thought that was an interesting reason to motivate a doctors guild to invest a large amount of money into something like this.It can't be said that a lot of money was invested in VMS. As for the materials, they were all quite cheap and common, the parchment was of poor quality, and, if I may say so, so was the scribe also
(17-07-2026, 11:16 PM)Daniel1992 wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.If that's already been looked into and ruled out, I'd genuinely want to know, since that's the part of this I actually care about being right or wrong.I do not know about this myself. I've never spent any time in the Constance Archives in my life
, but it might be worth it... It would be nice to find something similar, not necessarily identical.


