[Article] [Article]: New article by Layfield & Davis
#38
(15-07-2026, 06:20 PM)LisaFaginDavis wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.The folio numbers were written several hundred years later than the quire numbers. Since the quire numbers were written first, the missing leaves must have been singulion bifolios.

Were the folio numbers written before or after the book was bound?  How can we tell?

All the best, --stolfi
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: [Article]: New article by Layfield & Davis - by Jorge_Stolfi - 17-07-2026, 01:59 AM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  [Article] The Singulion and the Sequence: A Methodological Review of Layfield and Davis 2026 Torsten 12 4,495 03-08-2026, 01:29 PM
Last Post: Wladimir D
  [Article] New Article by Layfield and Davis LisaFaginDavis 12 7,055 11-06-2026, 02:36 AM
Last Post: Zauriek
  [Article] Notes on Four Sources Cited by Layfield and Davis (2026) Torsten 0 1,663 28-05-2026, 02:07 PM
Last Post: Torsten
  [Panel Session] Upcoming lecture and article LisaFaginDavis 1 1,721 15-05-2026, 08:50 PM
Last Post: DG97EEB
  [Article] Voynich Article in The Atlantic LisaFaginDavis 17 16,014 23-08-2024, 02:19 AM
Last Post: asteckley
  [Article] Article in Discover Magazine LisaFaginDavis 11 11,871 13-03-2024, 12:18 PM
Last Post: Torsten
  [Article] Voynich Paleography article LisaFaginDavis 59 63,397 21-06-2021, 09:25 PM
Last Post: LisaFaginDavis
  [Article] István Daruka - Cryptologia Article -JKP- 2 7,460 16-05-2020, 07:51 AM
Last Post: -JKP-

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)