13-07-2026, 08:10 AM
(12-07-2026, 07:05 PM)dashstofsk wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.It is so simple. Confoliate and conjoint correlation compliments this scenario nicely and the conclusion of this investigation should not surprise any hoax hypothesist.
But the problem for the hoaxists is the opposite: that the language (by all metrics) is in fact remarkably constant throughout the book. (Except for the abrupt A/B switch, that looks more like a change of spelling or encrypting than a change of language.) The variations from page to page are dwarfed by the similarities.
To explain this consistency, hoaxists must postulate that (1) the Author wanted to make the text look like natural language, even though its most obvious features were quite unlike those of any language known in Europe; (2) He had enough grasp of linguistics to know what that goal meant, and (3) he devised some complicated gibberish generation method that would do that, and used it consistently, though the whole book.
To me, that does not sound much more likely than the Secret Convent of the Lesbian Daughters or the Templars...
All the best, --stolfi