[Article] [Article]: New article by Layfield & Davis

[dashstofsk]

Evidence for singulions? Only if you are of the opinion that the text is meaningful.

But if you are an artificial construction / meaningless text / hoax hypothesist then there is a simple explanation for the high confoliate and conjoint scores. The author wrote the pages sheet-by-sheet. First both halves of a side then the other. As it was all meaningless he need not have done it any other way. When finally he felt he had enough, he stacked them in any order, any orientation. Moreover, at each sitting the writer approached the task with a fresh mindset. The style of the writing that day depended on his temperament and inclination that day. Knowing that no-one would ever understand the text he could change or adapt or apply some variation as he wished. Was under no obligation to make the text consistent or to follow any particular standard. If it so happened that the writer could only do at most two or three pages each day then it would follow that confoliate and conjoint pages would likely be similar in style and content.

It is so simple. Confoliate and conjoint correlation compliments this scenario nicely and the conclusion of this investigation should not surprise any hoax hypothesist.