09-07-2026, 10:33 PM
(09-07-2026, 10:11 PM)oshfdk wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.This appears to be a combination of a nomenclator with some elements from a constructed/a priori language. This has been a very popular hypothesis for a long time. As far as I understand, this was the leading hypothesis of Friedmans' (CIA/NSA) investigation of the manuscript in the 1950s.Something like that. I know that claiming it to be constructed doesn't account for many of the anomalous properties of the script; I would find it more likely it is a natural language. Above all, I am curious as to how predictable it is for one word to follow another, which would seem to me an indicator as to whether or not it even is language in the first place.