If I understood, what you're saying is that you found a group of words which consistently precede a 'double repetition', and another group of words which instead are consistently not followed by a double repetition. Is this correct?
I don't understand how to interpret the t-SNE map. Could you explain more? What do the red and blue colours stand for, in the light of your hypothesis? Why some words are labelled, and what does that mean?
And, to have an idea of the statistical power, how many 'double repetitions' did you identify and analyzed in the text?
You may have found something interesting, but it's hard to say before understanding more!
One thing I surely would not agree with is this:
Frankly, it looks a non sequitur to me.
I don't understand how to interpret the t-SNE map. Could you explain more? What do the red and blue colours stand for, in the light of your hypothesis? Why some words are labelled, and what does that mean?
And, to have an idea of the statistical power, how many 'double repetitions' did you identify and analyzed in the text?
You may have found something interesting, but it's hard to say before understanding more!
One thing I surely would not agree with is this:
Quote:For example, one of the highest peaks in the entire book is at folio f108, right before the extraction of the final folios. This strongly supports the historical hypothesis that those removed pages contained the conversion matrices or "Tabulae" required to decode the frequent logical transitions in those sections.
Frankly, it looks a non sequitur to me.