Month names collection / metastudy

[Zauriek]

Here we see the clearest example yet of a french+German mix.

Does this mean that in the 1300-1500 when an author knew diferent languages, she/he mixed them up for the month names? 
It seems to be at random, like no second thought being made about it; In wich case it does not mean a dialect of french-german but like an interpolation of languages; 
what about the text, are french and german words mixed in? i can not read it; if yes, i assume the selecting of words for each language gives piority to important nouns for a language an important verbs for another one.

In case this interpolation is something real, the marginalia month names are not a native natural language but just an evidence of the languages the scriba knew: "iollet" and "aberil" may be from lost dialects learned from somewhere at some point.

Not sure how this german-french mix works in the ms (Staatsbibliothek Bamberg Msc.Med.22) besides the month names, if it can be labeled as a new sintaxis or just a selective use of diferent words of diferent languages; is like how in the marginalia some text has like 2 languages, like voyniches and "german."

*I think im readit all wrong, i apologize in advance (80% sure it is wrong). page: 59r
   
59v