Month names collection / metastudy

[Zauriek]

But a single hand wrote:
abrelle, aberelle, and ab'elle (which could be either)

Oh man, that is a lot of variance; Does this mean they did not care about the changes or were they respecting the sources? like "i copied this from 3 diferent works where each one had its own dialect." Or "this sounds kinda the same so it should be fine, everyone can understand this month" or they made soft mistakes and ignore them, is so weird to me.

my only hope is that, since the marginalia month names are a personal note the scriba may have used is native language, i mean there is not much reason to copy the month names for a mental note (uncertain about this.) The case would have been diferent if there is more selected text that this scriba had to write over the voynich as some form of glosses (this idea feels a lite bit farfetch tho.) Still hope a exact sequence match can be found, that would be pure gold.

--[this is most probably not relevant but wanted to mention it just in case]
(Francia [Nantes] 1451-1500) ms: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.

   
I don't understand "march" and august and some other letters; october is the latin form? Is confusing to me why they mix two languages french and latin like that.