21-06-2026, 06:35 PM
(This post was last modified: 21-06-2026, 06:54 PM by Zauriek.
Edit Reason: new idea
)
So, most of the plants have no text at all to describe them. If the voynich follows the same pattern, may the voynichess text of the plants were added way latter? Maybe the original Voynich manuscript did not had so many description of plants.
And pushing down this baseless-idea, could that have something to do with the 2 diferent types of sintaxis, the A and B sytles? And if that conclusion is valid, why did the voynichess changed like that in a short life spawn (assuming the added text were added before the marginalia month names) [There are so many ifs... -.- sorry.]
--[Edit]
Wait, in that logic, there is also the posibility that the empty plants were ripped off, lost or just not added to the manuscript binding.
Or the Erbario LSJ 419 was not fully finished.
And pushing down this baseless-idea, could that have something to do with the 2 diferent types of sintaxis, the A and B sytles? And if that conclusion is valid, why did the voynichess changed like that in a short life spawn (assuming the added text were added before the marginalia month names) [There are so many ifs... -.- sorry.]
--[Edit]
Wait, in that logic, there is also the posibility that the empty plants were ripped off, lost or just not added to the manuscript binding.
Or the Erbario LSJ 419 was not fully finished.