26-05-2026, 05:04 PM
(26-05-2026, 04:44 PM)Dunsel wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.I think the Vounich is implausible. If it is copy mutate, the best you can hope for is statistically comparable
Everyone hopes for an exact explanation or reproduction. What if there isn't one?
If there isn't one, then there isn't one. I understand that a lot of people see the need for some closure, but personally I'm ok with not knowing how the manuscript was created, at least for now.
(26-05-2026, 04:44 PM)Dunsel wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Try my challenge in a previous reply. See if you can make statistically correct Voynich with it.
I think I did exactly that in my reply, it broke down immediately. I took a very common word "dain" and I identified that introducing some simple changes to it that pass the ledger produces words that not only are unattested in the manuscript, but also don't conform to CLS framework (which is ok in rare cases, but not generally). This challenge doesn't produce statistically correct Voynichese.