(22-05-2026, 01:31 PM)Dunsel wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.our estimate for the theoretical space pretty accurate. I calculated 203 possible variants. But your ~10 alternatives is underestimating.
Fair enough. When oversimplifying things, they become oversimplistic...
How many variants will cover for the most frequent 95%?
I guess the top ten won't do it, but it will be relatively close.
(22-05-2026, 01:31 PM)Dunsel wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.And they're not evenly distributed.
Very distinctly uneven. This is also important, though it will be hard to say more than that this indicates the existence of rules.