19-05-2026, 10:39 PM
(19-05-2026, 07:53 PM)dashstofsk wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Also it is highly probable that the sections of the manuscript were written at different times. And because it is also highly probable that the writer was using the alphabet no-where else the gaps of time might have been sufficient for the writer to lose his momentum, lose just enough fluency for him to have to re-adapt to writing anew. The language in each new section then becoming slightly different, giving us the separate language clusters we can see, the most prominent being A and B.
You Sir spurred a brain fart. I have been stupid. I was taking the scribes in the order of the manuscript. I've done some preliminary tests but I'm beginning to think that Scribe 3 was actually the second scribe. Not Scribe 2. I believe this would ease that abrupt transition I keep seeing between Currier A and Currier B.
| comparison | Pearson correlation | cosine similarity |
|---|---|---|
| Scribe 1 vs Scribe 2 | 0.571 | 0.611 |
| Scribe 1 vs Scribe 3 | 0.735 | 0.763 |
| Scribe 2 vs Scribe 3 | 0.943 | 0.948 |