(14-05-2026, 11:42 PM)ReneZ wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.This already results in 4x2x3 = 24 combinations, leading to different statistics
This is true, that's why I'm willing to consider as many charts as needed. My intuition tells me that no natural language would behave in the way the Voynich Manuscripts k words behave, simply because this is not the way language sequences are constructed. No elements of any language, be it words, syllables or phonemes, would produce a near perfect independently uniform distribution of popular prefixes and suffixes for any fixed central sequence. There is no mechanism in any language I know that could cause this even by accident. I have no proof of this and I don't know if it's possible to prove this.
In any language allowed elements are usually restricted by the preceding elements. For example, you can start a sentence with any letter, but you cannot continue "this day was ver..." with most letters of the alphabet, you are restricted to only a few letters that will make sense. The independence that the Voynich MS charts show demonstrate that in the Voynich MS most popular suffixes after some central characters can be chosen independently of the prefix. The prefix doesn't appear to affect which suffixes you can use. This looks unlike any language to me.