25-06-2025, 10:33 AM
I think the time has come to give some more evidence for my belief that the text of the manuscript is an artificial construction.
Consider the k words from the language B pages listed in matrix form.
[attachment=10889]
To generate this I took all k words and then split them to get the initial and final parts. I then counted the frequency of words formed by the merger of every initial-final combination. The cut off count for the parts was set at 20. You will see that for the most frequent initials and finals every combination yields valid words that are frequent.
Now compare the word counts against estimates of what would be expected if the initials and finals were applied randomly. For instance out of 6546 k words 1343 start ok and 537 end kedy. The expected count of okedy should be 1343 x 537 / 6546 = 110. The actual number is 108 which gives a ratio value of 0.98. This is very encouraging.
[attachment=10890]
This matrix gives all the ratios. The word counts for the most frequent words are broadly in the range of what would be expected. No significant big swings from parity. The general parity between the observed and expected tells us that the choice of initial and final is largely independent, that the final part of the words are not dependent on the initial part. This suggests that some arbitrary construction has been used for these words, that they have an artificial structure.
That was for k in the language B pages. The same is similarly true for t words in B.
[attachment=10894]
[attachment=10893]
The frequencies for the initials and finals are different. There is more variability in the initials and less in the finals. We can only guess what method the authors used to write k t words. But I like to imagine that the authors had their ‘favourites’ for the start of the word. Then they wrote a k or t ( chosen possibly random or possibly dependent on the chosen initial ). Then a random final, of which the authors also had ‘favourites’, but this was largely chosen without much regard for what came before.
The authors seemed to understand that in order to give the constructed text a semblance of genuineness they had to add variability. Their fraudulence would be suspected if words did not appear to be ordered in descending frequency that is usual in languages.
But the significant fact is that the initial and final word parts are independent. And this is where the authors made a mistake. Such behaviour is not present in European languages, and it gives us evidence of a method of construction.
In language B there are 6546 k words and 3397 t words. The words given in the matrices sum to 7406. That makes 74%. This is a sufficient value to affirm that some method has been used to construct these gallows words, and therefore that this might also be true for the whole of the manuscript.
Consider the k words from the language B pages listed in matrix form.
[attachment=10889]
To generate this I took all k words and then split them to get the initial and final parts. I then counted the frequency of words formed by the merger of every initial-final combination. The cut off count for the parts was set at 20. You will see that for the most frequent initials and finals every combination yields valid words that are frequent.
Now compare the word counts against estimates of what would be expected if the initials and finals were applied randomly. For instance out of 6546 k words 1343 start ok and 537 end kedy. The expected count of okedy should be 1343 x 537 / 6546 = 110. The actual number is 108 which gives a ratio value of 0.98. This is very encouraging.
[attachment=10890]
This matrix gives all the ratios. The word counts for the most frequent words are broadly in the range of what would be expected. No significant big swings from parity. The general parity between the observed and expected tells us that the choice of initial and final is largely independent, that the final part of the words are not dependent on the initial part. This suggests that some arbitrary construction has been used for these words, that they have an artificial structure.
That was for k in the language B pages. The same is similarly true for t words in B.
[attachment=10894]
[attachment=10893]
The frequencies for the initials and finals are different. There is more variability in the initials and less in the finals. We can only guess what method the authors used to write k t words. But I like to imagine that the authors had their ‘favourites’ for the start of the word. Then they wrote a k or t ( chosen possibly random or possibly dependent on the chosen initial ). Then a random final, of which the authors also had ‘favourites’, but this was largely chosen without much regard for what came before.
The authors seemed to understand that in order to give the constructed text a semblance of genuineness they had to add variability. Their fraudulence would be suspected if words did not appear to be ordered in descending frequency that is usual in languages.
But the significant fact is that the initial and final word parts are independent. And this is where the authors made a mistake. Such behaviour is not present in European languages, and it gives us evidence of a method of construction.
In language B there are 6546 k words and 3397 t words. The words given in the matrices sum to 7406. That makes 74%. This is a sufficient value to affirm that some method has been used to construct these gallows words, and therefore that this might also be true for the whole of the manuscript.
