(13-05-2026, 07:32 PM)Stefan Wirtz_2 wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.For what? What could you prove with this?
This can show that the way prefixes and suffixes in the Voynich Manuscript behave does not occur in natural languages. I think this may be true for any normal representation of any natural language in the history of humankind, doesn't have to be a 600 years old MS. I think this should work for whatever popular language theories are discussed now on the forum, for Bavarian, for Chinese, regardless if expressed as pinyin or characters. In a sense this may cast doubts on any plaintext theory.
I believe that it is an essential property of any language that for selecting any character or sequence B and splitting the text by some sequence (spaces or boundary characters) and getting all ABC chunks, it's impossible for A and C to not show strong dependence on one another.
But this is just my intuition now, to confirm/reject this one needs to run tests using different kinds of central characters and different kinds of word splitting.