[split] What can the structural peculiarities of the VMS tell us about the nature of the underlying text
#51
Oh, I just noticed: Patrick Feaster (Griffonage 2020) provided a list of 7 rules that predicts ~95% of mid-word breaks.

I calculated it a little differently—taking all spaces into account -  but I get essentially the same results. Well, then I don’t need to publish that.

There is no language (at least none that I know of) that produces something like this. In my opinion, this is very clear evidence that spaces are not “real” word boundaries - (but maybe Stolfi's chinese approach)

I see two reasons for this, but perhaps others have more:

1. The actual encryption takes place at a deeper level (whether as a cipher or a generator); the spaces are a diversionary tactic.
2. The spaces are part of a cipher.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: [split] What can the structural peculiarities of the VMS tell us about the nature ... - by JoJo_Jost - 12-05-2026, 10:48 AM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Brainstorming: could VMS words have an underlying 3-part structure? ThomasCoon 12 6,291 11-12-2025, 08:11 PM
Last Post: JoJo_Jost
  The pragmatic nature of the script davidjackson 24 27,131 10-02-2017, 01:31 PM
Last Post: Davidsch

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)