[split] What can the structural peculiarities of the VMS tell us about the nature of the underlying text
#49
(12-05-2026, 08:02 AM)Jorge_Stolfi wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.In conclusion: if you must do statistical analysis of the text, don't focus on characters, focus on words.  And if you need to merge words into word classes (say, to reduce the volume of the results or the sampling noise), try to use classes that are defined by some semantic criterion (like co-occurrence), not by the characters that occur in them (like "qo-words" or "words with gallows").

Well - if only we knew that the word boundaries in the VMS are actually word boundaries. You can cover up to 82 percent of all spaces with just 8 simple rules (I’ll post those rules later in another thread) - which really goes against the idea that they’re normal word boundaries....
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Advice to Computational Voynichologists - by JoJo_Jost - 12-05-2026, 08:38 AM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Brainstorming: could VMS words have an underlying 3-part structure? ThomasCoon 12 6,291 11-12-2025, 08:11 PM
Last Post: JoJo_Jost
  The pragmatic nature of the script davidjackson 24 27,131 10-02-2017, 01:31 PM
Last Post: Davidsch

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)