[split] What can the structural peculiarities of the VMS tell us about the nature of the underlying text
#22
@ Stolfi That was a question asked out of genuine curiosity.

At first glance, the “m” just doesn't seem that clear to me. The inner “m” is, on average, 20.4 glyphs away from the end of the line. Baseline (all token-final glyphs, not at the end of the line): 24.1 glyphs. So the inner “m” is only slightly closer to the end of the line than other endings

Plus: with this definition, you’re taking another glyph away from the VMS, which is tricky in itself.

But since we all just have theories Wink who knows if the m doesn’t actually serve this function...especially since it could have two functions.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: How should we deal with LLMs on the forum? - by JoJo_Jost - 08-05-2026, 06:04 AM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Brainstorming: could VMS words have an underlying 3-part structure? ThomasCoon 12 6,291 11-12-2025, 08:11 PM
Last Post: JoJo_Jost
  The pragmatic nature of the script davidjackson 24 27,131 10-02-2017, 01:31 PM
Last Post: Davidsch

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)