07-05-2026, 11:19 AM
(This post was last modified: 07-05-2026, 12:35 PM by Labyrinthinesecurity.)
(07-05-2026, 10:58 AM)oshfdk wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.(07-05-2026, 10:36 AM)Labyrinthinesecurity wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.The improved grammar (F1=0.242) outperforms Zattera's grammar (F1=0.214) when both are scored on our corpus. However, Zattera reports F1=0.270 on his own filtered corpus (~5,105 types), and our grammar was F1-trained on the test corpus while his was not.
What are the You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.? I don't think F1 is informative when comparing two different grammar mechanics. Whatever "switchable templates" are they sound like they can capture some information too, leading to a visibly better numbers for no actual improvement in the grammar.
I wasnt aware of Lanzini's metric, as a big fan of Kolmogorov complexity I can only approve of Nbits, its sounds like a perfect addition to coverage! Thanks for sharing this gem
