01-05-2026, 11:32 PM
(01-05-2026, 04:32 PM)Koen G wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.That said, even when using a specified source, it's still full of nonsense. Some things it says about my activity at Ninja:
Quote:Non-Linguistic "Process" Theory: One of his most significant contributions is the hypothesis that the manuscript might not be a linguistic text at all (not a natural or artificial language). Instead, he proposes it is a process-encoded system where symbols function as operational markers or states.
Visual-Attentional Framework: He has developed a model (the Gate–Scaffolding Model) suggesting the manuscript was designed to guide a reader's visual attention in a specific, rhythmic scanning pattern. In this view, certain words act as "anchors" or "gates" to stabilize the eye's movement across the page.
I feel slandered.
This is stunning. Unless you've been secretly working with an LLM to develop a Voynich decoding theory, it is now projecting its own opinions on others. Was this Gemini?