(19-03-2026, 11:18 AM)Muhammadzubair#1 wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Important methodological note: EVA is a glyph-labeling system, not a phonetic transcription. No argument in this paper claims that an EVA token matches an Arabic word because they look or sound similar. All such phonetic reasoning is explicitly avoided.
lol, so now you've updated your paper (and your original post) to say that you aren't claiming this because I specifically called out that that's what happened?
(19-03-2026, 11:18 AM)Muhammadzubair#1 wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.No human peer review was conducted prior to posting.
So why did you say it was peer reviewed 3 times? Do you think we have memory loss?
(19-03-2026, 11:18 AM)Muhammadzubair#1 wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.This research was conducted with assistance from Claude (Anthropic) and Grok for corpus analysis and text drafting. Research direction, source selection, and analytical framework were provided by the author.
I guess research direction/analytical framework means "prompt". There is a reason this type of AI assistance isn't allowed on the forum; we end up wasting time trying to work out if people are doing the research themselves.
